When we think about pipes and their upkeep, we usually think of the oil and gas sectors and the growing number of pipelines. However, pipelines are used for more than merely transporting petroleum. For instance, they’re widely utilized in the nuclear, pharmaceuticals, and food service sectors, all of which rely substantially on piping systems to function correctly. This necessitates pipe weld examination in these businesses as well. Water tank inspection services providers are aware how essential it is to undertake pipe weld inspections.
In such sectors, pipes and welds may be required to meet stringent sanitary and structural requirements. Steel or any other iron alloy materials are commonly employed to meet this need. Different non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques may be utilized to see if the weld done in such pipe materials is strong, faultless, and pure.
Ferritic and Austenitic Metal Pipe Welds
Carbon steel has long been the preferred material for its structural strength when it comes to pipes. On the other hand, carbon steel pipes aren’t exactly suitable for sectors like biopharmaceuticals and food manufacturing, where cleanliness and purity are critical. Furthermore, the metal’s corrosive activity might be enhanced by acids and bases present in the food or pharmaceutical substance. The corrosion-resistant qualities of ferritic and austenitic stainless steels are therefore favored.
Austenitic and ferritic metals can give structural strength comparable to carbon steel and provide corrosion resistance. Due to their different microstructures, the weld priority of various pipe materials might be one-of-a-kind.
Weldability is often worse in ferritic metals than in austenitic metals. As a result, welding such material can reduce durability and elasticity while raising the risk of hot cracking and thermal decomposition in the heat-affected area. Heat input while welding must also be carefully considered for austenitic metals with limited thermal conductivity qualities. They are also prone to oxidation and microcracking in the same way.
Contamination can result from any fault created by an incorrect weld, which is a big worry for companies that follow tight sanitary rules. Tank inspection services providers utilize non-destructive testing methods to inspect pipe welds as NDT can avoid such a situation.
Pipe Weld Inspection using NDT Ensures Industry Standards
While inspecting stainless steel pipe welds, microcracking, oxidation, entrapment, and absence of fusion are some of the defects that specialists look for. All of this is the result of a faulty welding procedure. While optical, magnetic particle and radiographic testing have been employed in the past, ultrasonic (UT) and eddy current (EC) testing are becoming more popular.
The EC inspection method is useful for detecting faults on or near the surface, such as microcracking. The fluctuation in the magnetic field can be observed as the eddy current is created in the metal, suggesting the likelihood of surface fractures that may not be seen during eye inspection. In the same way, utilizing the PAUT (Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing) approach, in-depth faults, including inclusions, lack of weld fusion, fractures, and pores, may be easily found using ultrasonic waves passing through the pipes.
If operating efficacy is to be preserved and leakage minimized, various inspection approaches must be used. Contamination can put the consumer’s health in danger. EC and UT can assist enterprises in avoiding this predicament by discovering defects before installation and regularly while in use.
Using NDT to maintain safety and sanitary standards
After the pipes and tubes have been welded, NDT technologies may be used to assess their quality. A periodic examination can reveal weaknesses that have grown over time, signaling the need for restoration and maintenance. NDT technologies such as EC and UT may provide in-service pipe weld inspection with little downtime. Any source of contamination may be readily removed through practical inspection, allowing enterprises to fulfill sanitary requirements while maintaining cost-effectiveness and efficiency.…